Keynote: Lee Rainie from the Pew Internet & American Life Project.
For full notes on the presentation, see the following excellent recap form Nicole Engard.
For more Pew Internet use information see the reports here and here.
- Wireless Internet. Cell Phones. Pay attention folks. This is where we are headed, and libraries had better be ready to ask the necessary questions about where we fit in.
- Education level is a good predictor of library use. Should this make us worried that the people who may be the least likely to use the library may be those who need us the most?
- He spoke about community evangelism and the value of giving your zealous patrons access to and training in Web 2.0 tools so that your happy customers can sing your praises to the larger community. I often think that the only marketing tool more powerful than an happy customer is a happy customer given a voice and a platform for spearding the word!
- Lee Rainie: “Aspire to be a node in people’s social networks.” For everyone out there who is unsure about libraries becoming engaged in online social networking initiatives, I think this statement comes pretty close to pointing the way. Unless you work in a library, nobody’s life revolves around the library. But if libraries are there as part of someone’s social environment, they become a likely resource someone may turn to when a problem needs solving. I guess it was always that way… but now many of us have moved a good amount of our regular daily lives online, and libraries need to be part of that landscape as well.
- People who don’t use the Internet when solving problems usually don’t so because they aren’t really aware of what is there to help them. Are non-library users similarly unaware of what the library has to offer? I say hells yeah. Rainie suggests that “Gen Y” users are so much more likely to use the library when trying to solve problems in part because they have the most recent “forced” experience with what the library has to offer (through school).
There was a lot more food for thought in this session… and he started to get to a slide looking at different types of literacies (graphic, navigational, contextual, etc) when the session was brought to a close for time. But maybe all of this is fodder for another day.
Tags: CIL2008, marketing, Web useView blog reactions
Entries (RSS)
generic acomplia
purchase cialis overnight delivery
cheap acomplia online
buy generic clomid
buy cialis low price
viagra without prescription
where to buy cialis
lowest price levitra
where to buy propecia
cheap cialis from canada
lasix no prescription
viagra without rx
cheap accutane tablets
viagra online without prescription
viagra no rx
buying cialis online
zithromax
viagra in uk
free cialis
cialis us
where to buy acomplia
find cialis online
buy viagra lowest price
accutane prescription
buy cheap accutane online
cialis buy
buy generic cialis online
acomplia
order propecia online
lowest price synthroid
synthroid without a prescription
synthroid online
buy propecia online
cheap levitra online
where to buy levitra
cialis online review
synthroid prices
cialis generic
cialis buy drug
buy viagra on line
viagra pharmacy
cialis for order
price of levitra
zithromax online
where to buy synthroid
soma generic
generic clomid
propecia online stores
viagra cheap drug
cheap generic soma
cialis cheap
zithromax online cheap
order accutane online
purchase zithromax online
purchase viagra online
buy cheap clomid
cheap generic propecia
zithromax pharmacy
online pharmacy cialis
cheapest acomplia
cost of cialis
no prescription viagra
free viagra
purchase lasix online
cialis from india
viagra from india
order discount cialis
soma online stores
find no rx cialis
cialis no rx required
find viagra without prescription
approved cialis pharmacy
lasix discount
April 9th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
“Education level is a good predictor of library use. Should this make us worried that the people who may be the least likely to use the library may be those who need us the most? ”
ABSOLUTELY! In a library system, you will find the poorest performers are the one’s in low-income low-education areas. It takes a disproportionate amount of funding for this kind of library to perform at the level of a library in an affluent community.