OK, so I’m lumping two sessions together here. But they were back-to-back sessions in the “Industries Using Hot Tech” track, so I don’t feel too bad.

I’m glad to have attended these two programs, as I am a huge believer of looking outside of LibraryLand for inspiration.

The first, “Learning From Newspaper Publishing,” featured a look at changes to the New York Observer’s online presence (check out their “head cloud!”). David Free wrote up a great rundown of the basic points from the presentation.

My take:

Libraries can learn so much by looking at what other industries have done, the challenges they have faced, and the concerns they are thinking about when building these online community interfaces.

Especially helpful here was the notion of examining your users in terms of basic “types” and examining ways the site could address the habits and needs of those kinds of customers. For example, “Loyal Readers” tend to go straight to the home page and browse… so they need content on the home page to cater to those habits in much different ways from “Accidental readers” who find the content based on a search and have a single article focus… and therefore need different features to engage them.

Libraries: How often do we really aggressively study the habits of our users when it comes to our online resources? Do we have good data to back up the assumptions we make about how patrons use our services? Are we providing use options aimed at different kinds of users with different goals and habits?

Also, the idea of pulling in third party apps to meet users needs is something libraries need to pay attention to. If somebody else does it better, why do we always seem to want to re-invent the wheel?

Third, I was glad the presenter talked about aggressively marketing the services once they were built. And he wasn’t just talking about ads, but an entire marketing strategy for attracting users and encouraging use. This includes complimentary services and features to further engage potential users, and seems integrated with the whole community atmosphere now created by the site.

After the Newspaper session, I stayed on for the “Learning from Politics” session featuring Justine Lam, the eCampaign Director from the Ron Paul campaign.

This fascinating session looked primarily at the fundraising initiatives of the campaign, and definitely had a few interesting ideas for libraries.

For one, I was intrigued by what the speaker referred to as the “hub and spoke” model for the online campaign. She stressed that what they created was not a new social network, but a means by which existing social networking tools were connected for a common cause. YouTube, Meetup.com, Facebook, etc. already exist and are a part of users lives. So the strategy was to reach out and use these existing networks to spread the word in an efficient, low-cost way.

She also spoke a lot about transparency and the way that the campaign used graphics using real time fundraising figures to (very successfully) encourage fundraising efforts. This was one of the real community building features that helped the campaign site become a collaborative effort between the campaign and its supporters.

The campaign also used a strategy of helping teach supporters to create, collaborate and share – giving them the tools to spread the campaign message and then letting them more or less do the work for them. Giving the supporters ownership and letting them go was the thing that really made this campaign revolutionary and successful.

Of course, the speaker did mention that once you put the campaign in the public’s hands, you can no longer control the message… and she pointed out that while it is great to let the users solve your problems, that of course means that you then need to let them know what your problems are. How many libraries are ready to deal with this???

Tags: , , , , ,

But I have learned never to blog while on cold medicine.

Another time, then.

Tags:

So I did a Google search for “Library” and got this as the targeted ads. Pet Supplies?

Now, according to  Google, the AdWords results that appear after doing a search are based on keywords specified by the purchaser of the ad. In their words,

 When people search on Google using one of your keywords, your ad may appear next to the search results. Now you’re advertising to an audience that’s already interested in you.

So I dunno.

Of course, I usually don’t even see these because of the Firefox extension Customize Google. So whatever.

Tags:

 

This line from Thomas the Tank Engine made my husband, Chris, spit coffee out of his nose the other day:

“Emily was a proud engine. She liked to tell the other engines how to do their jobs.”

F.U. Thomas. And you too, Chris.

Tags:

I have spent the first 8 days of 2008 trying to think of some goon New Year’s Resolutions, but I’ve had little luck. There are certainly things I’d like to turn over a new leaf on, things both in my personal and professional lives that I’d like to do differently this year. But I’ve had a hard time listing them – sometimes these sorts of things are so hard to define!

So I’ve decided to choose a mantra for 2008 instead. Something I can repeat to myself whenever I make those difficult decisions and face the challenges ahead. The mantra is simply this: I Am Not Afraid.

Afraid of what?

I am Not Afraid…

  • Of change
  • Of taking chances
  • Of trying new things
  • Of reassessing old things
  • Of making tough choices
  • Of sticking my neck out
  • Of being wrong
  • Of pissing off some people
  • Of failure
  • Of success

 
2008 will be a big year for Emily. And I’m not afraid of that. :)

Tags:

From the “things I wanted to blog when I first read them but never quite got around to it until now” file.

As my son, Robert, approaches his second birthday, I can’t get over how incredible it is to watch his development. Not only is it fascinating to watch him learn to put words, concepts, and actions together, it is also amazing to see the ways in which his experiences are shaping him in ways that would never have been possible when I was a child. In short, it’s really cool to watch a true “digital native” develop.

He is just now learning that a mouse (”Mowwwwws”) can also mean a small furry creature that causes Mommy to call the exterminator. He thinks Mommy’s laptop is cool… until he touches the screen and nothing happens (unlike his cousin’s Nintendo DS.) Lame. Anything long and skinny (yarn, the dog leash, a belt) is a cord and must be plugged in somewhere. Cameras must be handed to him each time a picture is taken so that he can see the “Bay-beeeee.” Cameras are not held up to the eye, but are used at arm’s length. I have received text messages from my son… mostly reading “44444444″. Elmo lives in the TV and can be brought up at any time. He also vacations in the computer, where specific songs can be viewed at will. His cousin’s Webkinz live next to the computer. You can call Pop-Pop from anywhere at any time. A glimpse of ear buds causes wild dancing.

Robert is an avid “EYEbrarrrr” user already, looking forward to visits to the place where books, “PUZZZ-ulllls” and computer games “clik! clik! beeeeep!” are available for his use. My hope is that his attachment will grow in the next few years of his life (although I hope he outgrows the tantrums as we leave…)

Anyway, to get to the point…

A while back Marketing Prof’s Daily Fix listed a number of things that marketers can learn from a 10-year old. To summarize, marketers should consider the upcoming generation and observe their values and how they operate a little. The basic findings:

1- Kids know a lot more about what’s happening online that you may think.

2- Kids do social networking naturally.

3- Being boring is the cardinal sin.

4- Kids like multi-media experiences.

5- Kids ignore online ads.

6 - Do not underestimate young people.

7 - Kids rock.

Maybe I just don’t have that much experience with kids. But I thought this was a great post… and I can really see this beginning to be the case with my little Digital Native. (The article even describes an incident where the 10-year old in question does a little tech trouble shooting to solve his Runescape problem!)

So let me throw something out there for discussion. I was told by a Children’s librarian a few months ago that while Adult services have been changed dramatically by technological advancements and social networking, Children’s services have basically not changed, and she didn’t see the central goals and missions of Children’s librarianship changing much in the near future. This was a very excellent, experienced and well-respected librarian who I admire very much. But I had to wonder about this…

Maybe this post is a little random, but it’s a question that interest me as a parent and as a librarian…

What do folks think?

Tags: ,

1608 - John Milton, English poet (d. 1674)

1909 - Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., American actor (d. 2000)

1916 - Kirk Douglas, American actor

1922 - Redd Foxx, American comedian (d. 1991)

1941 - Beau Bridges, American actor

1942 - Dick Butkus, American football player

1947 - Tom Daschle, American politician

1953 - John Malkovich, American actor

1957 - Donny Osmond, American singer and actor

1962 - Felicity Huffman, American actress

1972 - Tre Cool, German-born American drummer (Green Day)

Tags:

Someone asked me the other day if I ever get tired of being nice all the time. I had to laugh. Is that what people really think of me? If only they knew.

How many people came out of the closet today as The Annoyed Librarian? I lost count at about 12. And we are really no closer to discovering who the man/woman/group behind the AL really is. It could even be me…

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Tags: ,

Tags: ,

While I’m showing videos, here is another one that really grabbed me (found via).

A few of my random thoughts on the video and the conversations it led me to explore:

  • Did you catch the question: “To whom were these questions directed B.G. (Before Google)?”
  • I’d like to recommend adding another line to the section at the end. Why not “Ask Your Library:”?
  • Another thing I want to point out is the “Key Question” associated with this project:

    “Given the realities of our modern age and the demands of our children’s future, is it really okay to allow teachers to choose whether or not they incorporate modern technologies into their instruction?”

And don’t be afraid to accept the invitation to join the conversation. I think libraries have a lot that they could add. Or at least, they should.

Tags:
Creative Commons License
Close
Powered by
Email+ It
Powered by