I am moving to Denmark.

This video, sent to me by Sidsel Bech-Petersen of the Aarhus Public Libraries in Denmark is just that cool. It looks at the Transformation Lab project done to explore new possibilities for the library’s physical space. Awesome.

My favorite part (of many favorite parts!) is the comment: “The users like to become involved, providing it is not too much trouble and there is an instant result.”

There will be a presentation about this at the 17th Halmstead conference in Aarhus this year. The program is called Elevations, and it looks awesome. Maybe some of the European folks who stop by this blog would be interested!

Tags:

This is a blog about my profession, not my job. So I won’t bore anyone with accounts of the sessions I have attended at this conference regarding “job” stuff.

What I do want to talk about, though, is the opening session/keynote address given by Bob Cringely. Other bloggers have done a great job of summarizing, so I won’t “re-invent the wheel,” as so many librarians seem to like to say. Here’s Terry Ballard’s take on what happened, and Bill Topritzhofer’s account.

Bob touched on a few points in his speech that I’d like to address.

1. The disappearance of the physical manifestations of knowledge in libraries. In short, libraries are not going to be all about books. If you ask me, I’d say this is already true, but will become even more so in the future. And that’s OK, all you shocked book lovers out there. I’ve long felt that the role of the “library of the future” has more to do with education and the interpretation of information than with books. Which leads me to another of his points.

2. Librarians will be of value because of their expertise in handling knowledge. Here is how we stay relevant. Of course, that means that it has to be true that librarians are experts in finding, organizing, and interpreting information, no matter what the format of that info is. Which in turn means keeping up with the technological changes that will continue to accelerate. If you don’t want to keep current now, that’s fine. But don’t expect to be able to make a valuable contribution to your profession or your patrons in the radically different library environment of twenty years from now.

3. We tend to overestimate change in the short term and underestimate it in the long term. To me, this was a real AHA statement. It seems like many librarians (me too!) love to try and jump on the new interesting stuff that is out there, but then get disappointed when the new technologies, etc aren’t adopted by the general public right away. Then the efforts get abandoned as “failures.” How discouraging. It’s even more discouraging when things catch on later and become part of mainstream culture, but we seem like we “missed the boat” because our abandoned efforts were ahead of their time. Bob mentioned ebooks as a great example… remember when ebooks were all the rage in libraries… but nowhere else? Well, they’re coming back eventually, once the planets of social and economic forces have properly aligned, of course. Will we be ready? I sure hope so. I also hope that all of the great Web 2.0 initiatives that may or may not be a little ahead of their time will not be abandoned by discouraged librarians who don’t see enough ROI on their projects right away. I hope that we can all be patient with this… it’s coming, and it’s coming BIG TIME.

Overall, I really liked the keynote speech. It was engaging and fun, and the speaker made some great points about the future of libraries. And I think his message was received well, although I did sense some ruffled feathers when he talked about the disappearance of the book.

The world is going to be very different in 10, 15, 20 years. The baby boomers will have become our elderly population, Gen X and Y types like myself will be sending their kids off to college, and those kids (like my one year old, who already knows how to use a mouse) will be entering adulthood with a whole new set of expectations. Libraries and library professionals will need to adapt in order to remain relevant in that new world.

Where will your library be in 2027? Or should I say, Who will it be?

Tags:

This report from the Pew Research Center gave me a little pause for thought today.

I took the test and fell into the “omnivore” group (surprise, surprise!). What group do you fall into? What group do your coworkers fall into? Your patrons (as individuals, not as a group!)?

The next time I’m working with someone who is afraid of technology, resistant to change, or hostile to new ideas, I plan to ask myself what category they might fit into. Why do they fall there? What is important to them when it comes to technology? What is scary or hard? How can I address these concerns and help these reluctant folks move up just one category?

It’s always a good idea to try to understand the other guy’s point of view… especially when you’re trying to “sell” a new idea. If you have an idea of where people are coming from, it’s so much easier to help them take a step forward…. or to force yourself to take a step back if that’s what is needed.

Tags:

So here is an interesting discussion at Slashdot. The question is how we can define “the Internet” succinctly and in layman’s terms? This is a particularly interesting question/discussion for librarians and other information professionals to consider.

How would you define “the Internet” in such a way that the average person might understand it and not completely glaze over and tune out while it is explained?

Tags:
Creative Commons License
Close
Powered by
Email+ It
Powered by